KPIs Are Not for Rewards or Punishment—They Are for Improving Performance

 

Introduction

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) were never designed to be tools of judgment, rewards, or punishment. Their true purpose is to create clarity, guide improvement, and drive organisational learning. However, in many Sri Lankan industries such as manufacturing, banking, public sector operations, and even logistics KPIs are frequently used only at the end of the year to justify increments, bonuses, or disciplinary actions. This reactive approach undermines their strategic value and creates fear rather than improvement.


KPIs as a Learning and Improvement Tool

KPIs should function as continuous feedback mechanisms that help individuals and teams understand whether they are progressing toward strategic objectives. According to Armstrong (2020), KPIs support performance by making expectations measurable and enabling constructive conversations between employees and leaders. When treated as a developmental tool, KPIs help employees identify skill gaps, resource needs, and process inefficiencies instead of feeling policed.


Misuse of KPIs in Sri Lankan Organisations

In many Sri Lankan workplaces, performance reviews tend to be administrative activities rather than learning opportunities. Research shows that when KPIs are used solely for evaluation, employees become disengaged and focus on meeting numbers rather than improving behaviours or processes (Aguinis, 2019). For example, in some Sri Lankan manufacturing firms, KPIs such as daily output or rejection rates are used mainly to penalise workers, discouraging innovation and open communication. Similarly, in the public sector, KPIs are often introduced to satisfy audit requirements rather than genuinely enhance performance, resulting in symbolic compliance instead of meaningful progress.


KPIs Need to Be Fair, Transparent, and Aligned

A proper KPI system supports continuous improvement by encouraging collaboration and problem-solving. Parmenter (2015) stresses that KPIs must be leading, not lagging indicators focusing on behaviours and processes rather than just results. When employees understand the rationale behind KPIs and participate in setting them, commitment and ownership increase (Grow.com, 2024). CIPD (2023) highlights that transparent and co-created KPIs significantly improve engagement and reduce resistance to performance measurement.

Conclusion

KPIs are powerful when used correctly. They are meant to guide improvement, not to reward a few or punish many. For Sri Lankan organisations to truly benefit from performance management, KPIs must be repositioned as tools for learning, collaboration, and continuous progress. When KPIs shift from fear to empowerment, organisations build stronger capability, higher engagement, and sustainable performance.

 

References 

Grow.com (2024). The Controversy Over KPI Metrics in Performance Management. [online] Medium. Available at: https://medium.com/@grow.com/the-controversy-over-kpi-metrics-in-performance-management-9053cec9bed0 [Accessed 22 Nov. 2025].

Aguinis, H. (2019) Performance Management for Dummies. New York: Wiley.

Armstrong, M. and Taylor, S. (2020) Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. 15th edn. London: Kogan Page.

CIPD (2023) Performance Management Factsheet. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

Parmenter, D. (2015) Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing, and Using Winning KPIs. 3rd edn. New Jersey: Wiley.

Comments

  1. Your explanation of KPIs as tools for learning rather than judgment is very clear, and you show well how misuse in Sri Lankan organisations creates fear instead of improvement. You also highlight the value of fairness and transparency in a simple and strong way. The only thing you could add is a brief practical example to make your points even more grounded. Overall, you give a meaningful and well-focused view on how KPIs should really support performance.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is an important post which is many misunderstood perspective sometimes .Your post clearly addresses the meaning of KPI.Many organization still treated KPI as a tool for reward or punish employee which creates pressure,resistance and fear.but KPI provides guidelines ,inform or judgement on employees' work flow and it is a source of continuos improvement.They pointed out what's working well,where support needed and any process amendment.It should clearly communicate to employees for guidance not to be pressurized but to more engage and improve performance .

    ReplyDelete
  3. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) should be viewed as tools for learning, not mechanisms for reward or punishment. When organizations use KPIs to understand gaps, identify strengths, and improve processes, employees feel supported rather than judged. This encourages openness, continuous improvement, and genuine engagement with performance goals. KPIs provide clarity, align teams with strategic priorities, and highlight where coaching or resources are needed. When communicated transparently and used constructively, KPIs help build a culture of growth and accountability. Ultimately, their true value lies in guiding better decisions and enhancing overall organizational performance—not in evaluating individuals punitively.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As Aguinis (2019) points out, when key performance indicators (KPIs) are treated solely as evaluation or punishment tools, employees tend to prioritize achieving numerical goals rather than developing skills or improving work processes. noted by Aguinis (2019), when key performance indicators (KPIs) are treated purely as evaluative or punitive tools, employees tend to prioritise meeting numerical targets rather than developing competencies or improving work processes. This trend is visible in several Sri Lankan manufacturing contexts, where metrics such as daily production or defect rates are primarily used to highlight failures. pattern is visible in several Sri Lankan manufacturing settings, where metrics such as daily output or defect rates are used primarily to highlight failures. Such practices discourage innovation, risk-taking and honest communication, thereby weakening organizational learning cultures. risk-taking, and honest communication, ultimately weakening organizational learning cultures. A similar problem is evident in the public sector, where KPIs are frequently adopted to meet auditing or reporting expectations rather than to drive real productivity improvements. issue is evident in the public sector, where KPIs are frequently adopted to meet audit or reporting expectations rather than to drive genuine productivity enhancements. This leads to token compliance, in which employees complete documentation without committing to the underlying goal of improving performance. symbolic compliance, where employees complete documentation without engaging with the underlying purpose of performance improvement. As a result, the system reinforces administrative routine rather than fostering capacity development, accountability or strategic alignment. instead of fostering capability development, accountability, or strategic alignment.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are designed to measure progress and guide improvement rather than to serve as tools for rewards or punishment. When used effectively, KPIs provide clear insights into individual, team, and organizational performance, helping identify areas that need development or support. They encourage data-driven decision-making and create opportunities for constructive feedback, coaching, and skill enhancement. Misusing KPIs as a basis for rewards or penalties can lead to stress, disengagement, and a fear-driven work culture. Instead, focusing on continuous improvement fosters accountability, motivation, and professional growth. When employees understand that KPIs are meant to support their development and align efforts with organizational goals, they are more likely to embrace them positively. This approach strengthens performance, drives results, and builds a culture of learning and collaboration.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Great insights! KPIs are indeed meant to guide improvement and foster learning, not just to reward or punish. It’s interesting how you pointed out that in many Sri Lankan industries they’re often misused, which can create fear instead of motivation. Using KPIs proactively to track progress and support development would definitely unlock their true strategic value. Thanks for highlighting this important perspective!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Role of HRM in the Success of Organizational Restructuring

Industrial Automation and Unemployment: The Sri Lankan Perspective

Developing a Culture of Commitment Rather Than “Doing a Job”